<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
> <channel><title>Kommentare zu: Squeeze vom Macheist Laster gefallen</title> <atom:link href="http://www.aptgetupdate.de/2010/02/26/squeeze-vom-macheist-laster-gefallen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.aptgetupdate.de/2010/02/26/squeeze-vom-macheist-laster-gefallen/</link> <description>:: apt-get it or for-get it ::</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:11:55 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>Von: maxm2009</title><link>http://www.aptgetupdate.de/2010/02/26/squeeze-vom-macheist-laster-gefallen/#comment-59963</link> <dc:creator>maxm2009</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 12:04:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.aptgetupdate.de/2010/02/26/squeeze-vom-macheist-laster-gefallen/#comment-59963</guid> <description>sl 10.6 hat keinen ppc code mehr, wodurch halt das halbe system wegfällt ;)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sl 10.6 hat keinen ppc code mehr, wodurch halt das halbe system wegfällt ;)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Von: dr3do</title><link>http://www.aptgetupdate.de/2010/02/26/squeeze-vom-macheist-laster-gefallen/#comment-59592</link> <dc:creator>dr3do</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 07:16:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.aptgetupdate.de/2010/02/26/squeeze-vom-macheist-laster-gefallen/#comment-59592</guid> <description>Es passiert &quot;nichts&quot;.
Genauer: Die Files/Ordner die du auf im Targetmode hängenden SL-Mac veränderst, also neu speicherst, werden ohne Kompression abgelegt. Wenn der SL-Mac dann wieder selbst läuft, wird die Kompression wieder angeworfen.
Ja, das Problem ist, dass dieses Kompressionsfeature eben erst mit SL aufgekommen ist - zumindest am Mac.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Es passiert &#8220;nichts&#8221;.</p><p>Genauer: Die Files/Ordner die du auf im Targetmode hängenden SL-Mac veränderst, also neu speicherst, werden ohne Kompression abgelegt. Wenn der SL-Mac dann wieder selbst läuft, wird die Kompression wieder angeworfen.</p><p>Ja, das Problem ist, dass dieses Kompressionsfeature eben erst mit SL aufgekommen ist &#8211; zumindest am Mac.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Von: chris</title><link>http://www.aptgetupdate.de/2010/02/26/squeeze-vom-macheist-laster-gefallen/#comment-59586</link> <dc:creator>chris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 22:25:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.aptgetupdate.de/2010/02/26/squeeze-vom-macheist-laster-gefallen/#comment-59586</guid> <description>da bleibt noch eine Frage offen: was passiert wenn ich vai FireWire meinen auf SL laufenden Mac an einen PowerMac (der maximal auf 10.5 laufen kann) hänge?
Das ist ja dann unabhängig von Squeeze ein Problem, wenn ich das richtig verstanden habe.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>da bleibt noch eine Frage offen: was passiert wenn ich vai FireWire meinen auf SL laufenden Mac an einen PowerMac (der maximal auf 10.5 laufen kann) hänge?</p><p>Das ist ja dann unabhängig von Squeeze ein Problem, wenn ich das richtig verstanden habe.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Von: chris</title><link>http://www.aptgetupdate.de/2010/02/26/squeeze-vom-macheist-laster-gefallen/#comment-59585</link> <dc:creator>chris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 22:22:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.aptgetupdate.de/2010/02/26/squeeze-vom-macheist-laster-gefallen/#comment-59585</guid> <description>das damit zu 100% komprimierung gemeint ist steht bei dir auch nicht. da in SL auch jede menge PPC-Code entfernt wurde. was einen derartige Platzersparnis miterklärt.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>das damit zu 100% komprimierung gemeint ist steht bei dir auch nicht. da in SL auch jede menge PPC-Code entfernt wurde. was einen derartige Platzersparnis miterklärt.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Von: dr3do</title><link>http://www.aptgetupdate.de/2010/02/26/squeeze-vom-macheist-laster-gefallen/#comment-59531</link> <dc:creator>dr3do</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 20:40:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.aptgetupdate.de/2010/02/26/squeeze-vom-macheist-laster-gefallen/#comment-59531</guid> <description>I regret that you have been somewhat disappointed about this limitation, although I do of course understand it.
We are also not keen to release products with a very-limited feature set. In this case we were worried to miss some situation where the average user would be surprised to find data unusable or inconveniently accessible, and that&#039;s why we decided to remove that feature just before launch. We clearly underestimated the number of customers with setups that rely on several partitions.
As far as future upgrades go, we are now working to fix rare (but annoying) issues a few of our customers have experienced. We&#039;ll finish that urgent task soon, and then we can work on adding this feature and a couple of other good ideas that have surfaced.
Regarding your specific question about hardlinks, I&#039;m not sure how that would work. Not only are they difficult to create in Mac OS X, but it is also not possible (as far as I know) to create a hard-link across device boundaries. Do you have experience otherwise?
If you&#039;d rather wait to use Squeeze until the feature you need is ready, we completely understand - just let us know and we&#039;ll refund your order until then.
Finally, you are right that this limitation should be more apparent in our website. We will update our FAQ with this information.
Thanks a lot for your feedback, it is very useful and will certainly help us create a better product.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I regret that you have been somewhat disappointed about this limitation, although I do of course understand it.</p><p>We are also not keen to release products with a very-limited feature set. In this case we were worried to miss some situation where the average user would be surprised to find data unusable or inconveniently accessible, and that&#8217;s why we decided to remove that feature just before launch. We clearly underestimated the number of customers with setups that rely on several partitions.</p><p>As far as future upgrades go, we are now working to fix rare (but annoying) issues a few of our customers have experienced. We&#8217;ll finish that urgent task soon, and then we can work on adding this feature and a couple of other good ideas that have surfaced.</p><p>Regarding your specific question about hardlinks, I&#8217;m not sure how that would work. Not only are they difficult to create in Mac OS X, but it is also not possible (as far as I know) to create a hard-link across device boundaries. Do you have experience otherwise?</p><p>If you&#8217;d rather wait to use Squeeze until the feature you need is ready, we completely understand &#8211; just let us know and we&#8217;ll refund your order until then.</p><p>Finally, you are right that this limitation should be more apparent in our website. We will update our FAQ with this information.</p><p>Thanks a lot for your feedback, it is very useful and will certainly help us create a better product.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
